Posts Tagged writing

STEM Tuesday– Amphibians– Author Interview with Annette Whipple

Welcome to STEM Tuesday: Author Interview, a repeating feature for the last Tuesday of every month. Go Science-Tech-Engineering-Math!

Today, we’re interviewing Annette Whipple, author of Ribbit! The Truth About Frogs. The book investigates some of the more than 7,000 frogs around the world and invites readers to take an active interest in their preservation.

 

The Truth About the Writing Process

By Ann McCallum Staats

Ann: There’s a great mix of facts, incredible photography, and just-for-fun jokes and asides (which are TOAD-ally awesome to quote you!) in this book. Can you share how this all came together?

 

 

Annette: Ribbit! The Truth About Frogs is part of The Truth About series with Reycraft Books. I had already written about owls, dogs, and spiders—and I was ready to write about an animal familiar to me that I still didn’t know a lot about. (My favorite topics to write about are the ones I’m already curious about!) I suggested to my editor the next book be about frogs, and the whole team was on board!

Ribbit the Truth About Frogs book

Ann: I was fascinated by all the information packed into Ribbit!—who knew that over a 100 new species of frogs are discovered each year, for example? I’m curious; what is your research process like?

Annette: It absolutely amazes me that for the past twenty years (and probably longer) more than a hundred NEW species of amphibians have been found every year—and most of those are frogs! In the first two months of 2026, seven new kinds of frogs have been identified. I think that’s incredible.

Before I begin my official research for The Truth About books, I read general articles online for the topic. At this point, I really just want a good understanding. I’m not taking notes yet. After a bit of general information-gathering, I brainstorm a bit using a topic web (also called the bubble method or mind-mapping) to come up with different ideas I may want to research.

Frog pushing out their mouths

From there I plan my research. For topics like these animal books where I know many of the ideas I’ll research (diet, habitat, reproduction…), I use a spiral notebook as my research notebook. That’s where I take notes! I create a table of contents and number the pages. I also use it to keep track of my sources. For some of my books I use multiple 3-ring binders as well as folders in my file cabinet. I also save articles I’ve read online—either printed or saved as a digital PDF file.

My sources begin with scientific books, online journals, and research articles. (During the information-gathering phase, I’m not fussy about my sources. Once I’m taking notes, I must choose my sources very carefully.) I contact experts I can interview—and often meet. Often university professors are happy to share their knowledge with me—or point me in the right direction to another expert. Sometimes I consult with an expert online and meet with a different expert in person to get as much feedback and information as possible.

When I met with my frog expert, I heard wood frogs quack and the very loud (nearly painful) calls of spring peepers! If we had met a month or two later, we would have found different frog species in the same area.

I wrote an article about using a topic web here. https://www.annettewhipple.com/2021/07/how-to-brainstorm-nonfiction-writing.html

I wrote an article about my research notebooks here. https://www.annettewhipple.com/2021/09/how-to-set-up-research-notebook.html

Ann: What did you especially enjoy about writing this book? What was challenging for you?

Annette: I loved researching and learning so much more about frogs, because really my knowledge was fairly limited until then. My own knowledge was also my biggest challenge because I had so much to learn!

Images of what frogs eat

Ann: I’m impressed by the design and format of the book. Sections start with a question like “How do frogs eat?” followed by text, stunning photos, and an illustrated aside. How much of the design of the book did you participate in?

Annette: When I pitched the first book in the series, Whooo Knew? The Truth About Owls, I stated that I wanted the book to be photo illustrated in addition to art sidebars where I add humor. With that pattern established early on, there weren’t many surprises with Ribbit! The Truth About Frogs. Other than an occasional suggestion to include a photograph of a certain frog species, my design support was minimal.

Ann: You’ve written a lot of books! What is your writing routine like and how do you stay motivated?

Annette: Yes! By the end of this year I will have written more than 40 books. (The longest was 50,000 words. The shortest 250 words.) I don’t write every day, but I do write most days! When I have a hard time staying focused, I set aside a day to just focus on my writing process. So on those days, I don’t want to answer email, fold laundry, or post on social media. On Writing Days, I hunker down and just write!

Ann: What’s your origin story? How did you become a children’s book author?

I began blogging to share my child’s progress overcoming a speech disorder called apraxia. Before long, I realized I wanted to write more, so I took some writing classes and had a few published articles. A few years later I was reading The Chronicles of Narnia with my kids. We had a companion guide called Roar! to go with it. That’s when I realized I wanted to write a book like that: A book about a book—for kids. Soon I was working on The Laura Ingalls Wilder Companion: A Chapter-by-Chapter Guide and attending writing conferences.

Ann: What’s next for you? What do your fans (me included!) have to look forward to next?

This year I have a few more state books in the Who HQ series that will release including Where Is Missouri?, Where Is Minnesota?, and Where Is Wisconsin? I’m also working on a proposal for a historic nonfiction book—but I don’t have a contract yet!

Maybe I’ll have more news to share soon! I think facts are fun, so that’s my big focus. You can keep up with me with my monthly newsletter at https://substack.com/@annettewhipple. I also use social media! On Facebook and Instagram, find me @AnnetteWhippleBooks. At Twitter/X and BluSky, I’m @AnnetteWhipple. My website is full of articles for curious teachers, families, and writers. https://www.annettewhipple.com/

Ann McCallum Staats is a former teacher and award-winning author. Her latest books are Fantastic Flora: The World’s Biggest, Baddest, and Smelliest Plants illustrated by Zoë Ingram and A Quilt of Stars, co-written with astronaut Karen Nyberg and illustrated by Alida Massari. Ann loves to follow her curiosity and share what she finds with others. Find out more at www.annmccallumbooks.com

 

STEM Tuesday– Amphibians– Writing Tips & Resources

Hello! Welcome back to STEM Tuesday’s Writing Tips and Resources. I’m Stephanie.

Did you know that axolotls are amphibians? I hadn’t really thought about it before, but it’s true; they’re salamanders. And actually, they’re strange ones, since they don’t fully grow up, but instead stay in their “tadpole” stage, keeping their gills and living underwater completely. Very rarely, they can spontaneously morph into terrestrial animals. When this happens, their gills recede and they depend on their lungs to breathe.

Anyway, happy poetry month! If you’ve read last week’s post, you’re familiar with poems about frogs, like the informative ones found in Amphibian Acrobats. Today I’m excited to share two writerly resources with surprisingly relevant titles. The first, by a Utah poet and professor, is Real Toads, Imaginary Gardens: On Reading and Writing Poetry Forensically (2024). Its title references American poet Marianne Moore, who said that a poem is “an imaginary garden with real toads in them.” Elaborating on that, Rekdal states that a poem is “an artificial structure, yes, but one in which something genuine can live” (5). That definition sings—and croaks, and ribbits—for me. More on frog calls to come. We’ve got one long exercise today. Let’s hop to it.

Part 1 | Gathering Raw Materials

Book coverRekdal writes that, “When it comes to reading or writing poetry, we have to balance between the forensic and the creative, between staying within the bounds of definition and fact and moving into the realm of the interpretive” (35).

Thus, the first step is to gather interesting details for your imaginary garden: nickel-sized glass frogs, perhaps. You’re free to depart from the theme of amphibians, but if you like a good challenge, start there. Think “forensically,” gathering precise words as rhetorical evidence. Imaginary gardens are curated… this is your flowery language, your favorite nature facts rearranged into poetic phrasings. With every additional noun, you’re populating the garden, constructing the banks of the pond. Give yourself at least 15 minutes to brainstorm.

After assembling a motley group of characters, setting details, and imagery, it’s time to begin considering interpretation. How will you make meaning(s) of these things? Rekdal offers this insight, “If anything, poems offer me patterns of expectation and then disregard them in ways I find either delightful, annoying, instructive, or baffling” (3). How can you invite readers to feel those emotions? What might your metaphorical toad be—your something real? Aside from lyrical language, what’s the second layer to the poem? How can you take it from not-story to story? Let’s let those thoughts percolate while we try the next part.

Part 2 | Finding and Shaping Story

Book cover

The second writerly resource for today is A Swim in a Pond in the Rain by George Sanders. This book addresses structure through several guided readings of Russian short stories. He writes, “We’re always asking, of a work we’re reading (even if it’s one of our own): ‘Is it story yet?’ That’s the moment we’re seeking as we write. We’re revising and revising until we write the text up, so to speak, and it produces that ‘now it’s a story’ feeling” (50). But what is a story? He answers, “We could understand a story as simply a series of…expectation/resolution moments” (12). Isn’t that interesting? That’s also what Paisley Rekdal said about pattern, expectation, surprise. A story, or in our case, poem, has a call-and-response structure. What must come first? What details are essential? What will change? How does the poem end? How can the beginning enhance the end?

Choose an existing poem. If you’re feeling stuck, here are some suggestions: “[rain frog thorn bug bat tent], “Naming the Heartbeats,” or “Amphibians.” Before you’re tempted to read the poem in its entirety, cover up the last 2-6 lines. Read the first portion, then ask yourself these questions. What energy has the poem built up? How do you expect it to end? What ending feels so obvious that it would be disappointing? Now read the rest of the poem. What helps the poem land with a satisfying feeling?

Using your materials from part one, construct a poem that “responds alertly to itself” (Saunders, 29), that makes energy and then uses it (35), “advanc[ing] the story in a non-trivial way” (42). This is much easier said than done, but as Saunders teaches, “That’s really all a story is: a limited set of elements that we read against one another” (48). Tend your imaginary garden. Hide some toads. Find your voice, whether that frog-song is a cro-qui or a different onomatopoeia altogether. (They make lots of different calls!)

Remember that your poem, though it may turn toward a surprising resolution, doesn’t need to answer questions or conclude anything. Its power is the shared journey between writer and reader: sensing and thinking together. Poems can never avoid being situated, being about something, whether or not the author intends it. But as Paisley Rekdal wrote, “If we can all agree on the exact meaning of a poem, doesn’t that suggest the poem itself may be too narrow, even lifeless?” (Kidlit poems are the exception, in which we routinely opt for clarity and conclusions. But write this one for yourself! Poetry-joy is contagious.)

For themed writing prompts geared toward kids, check out Amazing Amphibians from our book list, specifically pages 49 (“Write a Slimy Story”) and 85 (“Write an Amphibian Haiku”). And of course, I’d love it if you clicked over to visit me at StephanieWritesForKids.com for more writerly tips and book recommendations.

Happy writing,

Stephanie

Stephanie Jackson is a mother of four kiddos ages 5-14. Her kidlit work has been published in Cricket magazine, Dirigible Balloon, and elsewhere. She holds an English creative writing degree and writes from her book-glutted home in northern Utah.

Author Spotlight: Allan Wolf

In today’s Author Spotlight, Jo Hackl chats with award-winning author Allan Wolf about his novel, Junius Leak and the Spiraling Vortex of Doom. Allan Wolf is the author of picture books, poetry, and young adult novels. Booklist has named his historical verse novel, The Watch That Ends the Night, one of  “The 50 Best Young Adult Books of All Time.” Allan is also the author of the nonfiction graphic novel The Vanishing of Lake Peigneur, illustrated by Jose Pimienta; and the poetry collection The Gift of the Broken Teacup, illustrated by Jade Orlando. His books celebrate his love of research, history, science, and poetry. He is also a skilled and seasoned performer of over 30 years. Allan Wolf’s dynamic author talks and poetry presentations for all ages are meaningful, educational and unforgettable. Florida Reading Quarterly calls Wolf “the gold standard of performing poetry.” He is a two-time winner of the North Carolina Young Adult Book Award, and a recipient of the Bank Street College Claudia Lewis Award for Poetry. Allan lives in Roanoke, Virginia, with his wife, his sister, and a dog named Mo. Learn more at www.allanwolf.com.

All about the book:

When thirteen-year-old Junius Leak—expert on waterbodies and creator of the encyclopedic Amazing Waterbodies of the World—steps foot on Uncle Spot’s rickety dock on Lake Peigneur, the truth assails him: he may love waterbodies, but that doesn’t mean they love him back. The latest in a long line of Junius Leaks, he’s the first to be doomed to ten days of awkwardness and boredom on a houseboat with a relative he doesn’t know while his parents “work on” their marriage. Delcambre, Louisiana, where Junius was born, is awash with unwelcome surprises.

He determines to learn why his mom left town when he was a baby—and to conquer his fear of water at the same time. But the lake has other plans for him, plans tied to a hundred-year-old family feud and a swashbuckling mystery. When disaster strikes, Junius must dive deep within to emerge an unlikely hero.

Alternating viewpoints spin the perceptions of a Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) — and the wry voice of a lake with a long memory—into an inventive tale of sunken treasure and buried secrets anchored by a breathtaking true event.

The Background of Junius Leak:

JH: The title alone is wonderfully dramatic. Can you tell us about the real-life events that inspired Junius Leak and the Spiraling Vortex of Doom?

AW: It was a Thursday, November 20th, 1980. Texaco had set up a 130-foot-tall drilling derrick on a 15-foot-tall platform in the middle of Lake Peigneur, a 1200-acre shallow freshwater lake in southern Louisiana. Texaco was exploring for the oil that gathers in pockets around the massive salt dome beneath the lake. When the derrick’s 14-inch drill bit accidentally pierced a massive salt mine that had been excavated beneath the lake, water began to drain into the mine, eventually opening up into a vortex, a quarter-mile wide, effectively draining the lake’s 3.5 billion gallons of water like a big bathtub. The ever-widening sinkhole, created a 150-foot waterfall made up of water from the Delcambre Canal that had begun to flow in reverse, filling the lake back in with salt-water from the Gulf of Mexico, nine miles away. Within four hours the hole had devoured a tugboat, eleven large salt barges, two working derricks, and about 58 acres of a beautiful botanical garden located near the lake’s shore. Amazingly, after another 48 hours, Lake Peigneur filled back in, transforming from a 10-foot deep freshwater lake into a salt-water lake with a 250-foot-deep crater in the middle of it. Even with 55 miners working beneath the lake that day, not a single human life was lost.

JH: That disaster served as inspiration for this story in your graphic novel, The Vanishing of Lake Peigneur illustrated by Jose Pimienta (You can find the interview with Allan and Jose here). How did you go about creating the fictional character of Junius Leak to explore this world?

AW:  The historical fiction story, Junius Leak and the Spiraling Vortex of Doom, grew out of the same research I was doing for my graphic nonfiction account, The Vanishing of Lake Peigneur. You might say that the two books were like paternal twins, developing separately while sharing the same womb. I began to see so many metaphors (swirling, spiraling, loss, sudden rejuvenation, etc.) emerging from the historical facts that a fictional story jumped out at me unbidden. I was already keen to try my hand at middle-grade fiction, so twelve-year-old Junius Leak sprung out of me. I had been exploring the world of Lake Peigneur as an adult for so long, it made sense to create my own 12-year-old doppelganger, Junius Leak to experience that world with me.

JH: You wrote in your author’s note that there is a lot of Allan Wolf in Junius. To which parts of Junius do you most relate?

AW:  As a child I was profoundly lonely and, even when I started making friends, I found these relationships to be exhausting and awkward. I now know that I suffered from some pretty debilitating anxiety, but back then no one knew what anxiety was. Back in 60’s and 70’s it was usually just called cowardice. And that’s how I always felt, like a coward pretending to be a normal person. I had escapes that helped me feel at ease: athletics, reading, skateboarding, and (especially) writing on my bedroom walls. Junius shares a lot of my own quirks, and he uses a lot of my own coping mechanisms.

JH: Did Junius surprise you at any point while you were writing the book?

AW:  Yes. I think any really good character (when given enough freedom) will surprise the author. With Junius I had to write a good bit to arrive at that spot in which he took on an intrinsically motivated life of his own. Picture a grown-up helping a kid to ride a bike. The grown-up runs alongside, one hand on the handlebars, one hand on the child’s back. The kid has a nervous but determined look on his face. Gradually the adult lets go and steps away, leaving the kid to zoom off all alone, usually shouting out, “I’m doing it!”

That’s pretty much the relationship between author and character. The author can create the bicycle, and the street, and even the character. But there comes a point in any character’s development when that character begins to make his or her own choices. I was most surprised at how Junius Leak, the character, had sort of a snarky sarcastic streak about him. As a kid who is arguably “on the spectrum,” he has trouble interpreting and projecting social cues. And yet he seems to understand sarcasm which requires a pretty sophisticated sense of one’s self in the world.  And that was perhaps the greatest surprise of all. When all is said and done, Junius Leak has an intrinsic sense of himself, something that I struggled with as a kid.

JH: If you could drop yourself into one scene from the book, which would you choose—and why?

AW:  There is a climactic scene toward the end of the story when something pretty miraculous comes springing up from the depths of the lake. That’s the scene I’d choose, and maybe a few other moments toward the end. I can’t say specifics without spoilers, but I can say that I love scenes when some long-forgotten detail comes back to fill in the last missing piece of a puzzle. Or the missing piece might have been there under your nose all the time. Point is, you’ve been taking this detail (an event or a character maybe) for granted; you’ve dismissed it as only a bit actor. I love these moments because they fill in the gaps emotionally. I love it when the puzzle pieces fall together. I find the emerging sense of order to be very soothing.

Writing for Middle Grade Readers

JH: What drew you to write for middle-grade readers?

AW:  Of all my novels, this is the first directed specifically at middle-grade readers. My books are typically marketed for YA and teens. So Junius Leak and the Spiraling Vortex of Doom, is “my take” on a middle-grade novel. The story unfolds more slowly, perhaps, than a typical middle grade plot. That’s just how I write right now. It’s something that serves me. I’m working out something stylistically. Hopefully with each progressive book, I will get better and better at it. As a professional writer of books for youth, I was drawn to middle grade because I’d never written one, and because middle grade seems the most steadfast place to be right now, in the constantly changing world of publishing.

JH: Middle-grade books often balance humor, adventure, and emotional depth. How did you approach that balance while writing this story?

AW:  When it comes to telling a story, my motto is “You can’t have ha, ha without a little ah ha!.” There’s nothing wrong with a good therapeutic chuckle. I love laughter, as long as it helps to further the story. But the most enduring humor has humanity at its core. So, I’d rather go for the kind of laugh that makes you cry, if that makes sense. Of course, you have to keep readers (young and old) moving forward in a plot-driven direction, but it is those emotional interjections that resonate in readers’ imaginations long after reading the final page.

JH: Were there any books that you loved growing up that influenced your storytelling?

AW:  A few picture books that have stuck with me: Mike Mulligan and his Steam Shovel; Ferdinand the Bull; Harry the Dirty Dog. Chapter books: Winnie the Pooh; Dr. Doolittle, Charlotte’s Web, James and the Giant Peach. And later, the novels of Paul Zindel. Much of my voice, though, comes from later exposure to Karen Hesse, Eloise Greenfield, Karla Kuskin, and especially Paul Fleischman. My own book, Junius Leak, has been compared to Holes by Luis Sacar, and I can see why. That book had a profound impact on me.

Writing Craft

JH: Did this book begin with a character, a plot idea, or your irresistible title?

AW:  As often as not, my book ideas begin with a startling and memorable image. Maybe because I was raised on movies and comic books. The image of the lake’s face swirling like a bathtub, and drawing in trees, boats, houses, and shoreline; that’s what I started with. Or the image of a solitary chimney sticking up out of the water in the middle of a lake; that’s what I start with. Then I might develop plot and character with that main controlling image in mind.

As for the book’s title, I worked with an actor named Junius Leek back in the 1990’s and vowed then to someday use his name as a character in a book. This watery book turned out to be the moment. As for the spiraling part of the title: again, that was inspired by image, and the overambitious vortex of doom is more of an ohmage to melodramatics of youth. It also sounds a bit “piratey,” so winner-winner-chicken-dinner. I do admit, that once I settled on the title, the book began to really take shape. A good title can do that . . . just make everything gel.

JH: Were there any scenes that were especially fun—or especially difficult—to write?

AW:  There is a scene in which Junius reunites with his mother and they have a chat. Originally, I left this scene out. In fact, Junius’ mom never even appeared in the book in real-time. But my editor, Katie Cunningham, thought the mother needed a scene near the end of the story. When I sat down to write it, only then did I realize why I hadn’t written it in the first place. I was dreading where I had to go as a writer. I had to essentially sit down with my own mother (who had recently passed away). That was hard. But worth it.

Jo: How long did it take from the first spark of the idea to the finished manuscript?

AW:  The spark came in 2007 when I first saw the lone chimney rising up out of Lake Peigneur. It was in 2019 when I sold the idea as a two-book deal to Elizabeth Bicknell at Candlewick Press. I researched documents and did in-person interviews for years. The initial writing itself took perhaps two years. I’m always working on more than one thing at a time. So, its often hard to tell what hours are spent on what book.

Jo: What was the biggest revision you made to the story during the editing process?

AW:  Not sure if this is really the “biggest” revision, but it was certainly a memorable edit.  I had named the town sheriff in my book after a real-life sheriff who had played a minor role in the Texaco-Lake Peigneur disaster. My idea was to use his name as a sort of ohmage. Much later I found out this particular sheriff had been a divisive person both personally and professionally. Rather than play into the controversy, I changed the sheriff’s name to Connor Murphy—the name of a little kid who lived down the street from me in Asheville, NC.

JH: What advice would you give to writers trying to write humor for middle-grade readers?

AW:  I would re-read my comments about humor above. Humor without humanity is hollow. Also, I would avoid making a joke at someone’s expense. It is mean and petty. If someone deserves to be put in their place, allow it to happen in the plot without your main protagonist simply acting out of a need for revenge. And of course, you should read a lot, lot, lot of funny books. I recommend Dead End in Norvelt by Jack Gantos.

What’s Next

JH: What projects are you currently working on?

AW:  I have a collection of Christmas poems in the works from Candlewick Press. And I’m writing a memoir (on spec) about how I began writing on my bedroom walls, as a 13 year old . . . fifty years ago!

————

Lightning Round!

Favorite place to write:
My desk.

Plotter or pantser?
I pants within a plot.

 If you were not a writer, what might you do for a living?
Mortician. Drummer in a rock band.

Coffee, tea, or some other beverage while writing:
Mostly coffee.

Your favorite writing snacks:

Cheez-its and goldfish.

Favorite fictional hero:

Underdog.

Favorite fictional villain:

Boss Hogg.

Jo: Thanks for chatting with us Allan!