Blog

A Christmas Gift from Mixed-Up Files: Interview with Jimmy Hawkins, who played Tommy Bailey in It’s a Wonderful Life

Hello Mixed-Up Filers!

First off, I wish you a very Happy Holiday season! And speaking of that, with today being Christmas Eve, we have a very special gift for you. If you asked everyone what their favorite holiday movie of all time was, I’m willing to bet that most people would answer, It’s a Wonderful Life. Well, I was beyond thrilled to get to speak to someone who was actually in the movie! 

Please help me welcome Jimmy Hawkins, who played Tommy Bailey in that classic film!

 

JR: To start with, thank you so much for joining us today. Looking at your credits, you have some impressive resume. You’re a writer, producer, actor with over sixty credits to your name. You started your career so young. You entered into it’s a wonderful life when you were only four. 

What do you remember about the process of being selected for the part?

JH: Well, my mom took me out to Culver City two or three times, and you’d go through the process. We met with Frank Capra and he never tested any of us kids, or had us reading. He just talked to us and then started matching kids up. Then, one day he called us out there and the four of us showed up and we were walked over to the stage at the RKO lot in Culver City. And then they brought Jimmy Stewart and Donna Reed out, and they had the six of us and took a picture and said, That’s it, that’s the Bailey family. And that’s kind of how that process went.

JR: That’s amazing. What memories do you have with, about being on the sets?

 

JH: Yeah, they’re very vivid. I remember getting woken up really early. It was still dark. And we went on buses and street cars out to Culver city. A man walked us a couple blocks from where the streetcar let us off and onto the studio lot and over to the soundstage. There was like an anteroom where you could stand if they were shooting, and then you’d see the red light going back and forth. And when it went off, you could go in, and that’s kind of how it worked. They had real snow outside of the house. They had the whole facade of the house, the front, everything. Inside there was lighting and there’s the big Christmas tree lit up. And, oh my God, it was really something there. We are in July. It’s 90 degrees outside, and snow inside. 

Our part took twelve days to shoot. They would take us to wardrobe and then makeup. But, you know, kids didn’t really use makeup. They just powder us down a little and then we’d go to school, you know, there’s the teacher on the set, but since it was summer, we didn’t have to go in for three hours of schooling or anything. We were available most of the day to do the movie. And I remember when we were doing various scenes. Frank Capra would give us business to do all the time. Like he had that Santa Claus mask around me. And he said, “Now you hold the mask up and you’re trying to scare this man”, which was Jimmy Stewart. And I got on his lap and I started putting hairs on his head, because Frank Capra said to do that. 

And it was always improvising on the set. I’d go through the scene with my mom the night before, but then when we went on the set, it was all different. He had written new shots the night before, like the “excuse me, I burped” line. It was a gag that his family had, and his young son, Tommy, who was my age, would always tell that joke, “excuse me, I burped”. So, he always tried to put comedy in scenes to break up that drama. He thought the best way to deliver that message of drama was through humor. So, he gave the older boy the job to ask questions. How do you spell this? How do you spell that? And then the little girl was on the piano, pounding away. And I was, “excuse me, excuse me”. Always tugging at him. I remember when we left the living room and walked into the kitchen, he would stop everybody. He would tell Stewart and Donna Reed, everybody stop. Then, he came over to me, and squatted down, and said, “See where we’re standing here. Right here. I want you to be pulling on this man’s coattails.

When you come out of that other room, pull on his coattails and then say, when you get right here to this spot, say, “Excuse me.” He said, you’ll want to try that. Excuse me. But right here, don’t say it until you reach right here. And then they walked another couple of steps, and he squatted down again. “I want you to keep pulling on his coattail, but say, excuse me again right here. You can do that.” Then, a third time, and we rehearsed it and finally shot it. 

Years later, Frank Capra and I were at the Academy. We’re both members of the Motion Picture Academy. And he was there for a director’s choice, where people would go, and they’d show the director’s favorite movie. Then they talked all about it afterwards. People would stand up and ask questions while we were there. One of the questions I asked him, “What was the most difficult scene to direct in the movie?” And he said the one with you kids.

I asked if we did something wrong? He said, “No, you were great. It’s just that I had so much business going on. You know, it was a very depressing scene. Jimmy Stewart had his problems and then I have the other kid ask him, how do you spell this? The girl is pounding on the piano. You’re burping. And they could have laughed at the scene instead of with it. I wanted to make it like real family life in this house, and how people really act and react, but it was a very difficult thing to do.”

 I asked him if remembered asking me to do the excuse me line three times. He said, yeah, but the second time, I didn’t say it exactly at the right time.

I asked, “Why did you print that out?” And he said, because it was natural, it felt more natural. 

JR: That’s great.

JH: And when we were shooting the scene where I’m wearing the mask and on Jimmy Stewart’s lap, and he’s contemplating the loss of $8,000, and he pulls me into him. And when he does, every time he did that in rehearsals and on the take, that mask would hike up. And the inside of the mask was like a sandpaper and it scraped my chin or my cheek each time. And we did it like two, three times rehearsing, then two or three times shooting. And that’s like five, six times. And then I went, Oh my God, this has gotta stop. 

So, these are vivid memories that I had. It was a wonderful experience. Capra was happy with it and he got what he felt he wanted. And we went on our separate ways twelve days later. 

They also brought in another director in the scene where Jimmy Stewart goes ballistic and he starts kicking over all the work. Capra was shooting some other scene, and the cameraman and this other director filmed our closeups, reacting to the dad going bonkers. And the director would talk to us about our feelings and what Jimmy Stewart is doing. And that’s kind of unique. Not many people know that, that another director actually directed those closeups.

 

JR: What was Frank Capra like?

JH: Very nice, man. Very patient. Took his time with all us kids and explaining what we were to do and how we were to do it. Just very nice memories. 

JR: Later on you were with Donna Reed again in her series. Can you tell us about that experience?

JH: In 1958, I finished shooting the Annie Oakley series, but I was still going out on tour, to state and County fairs doing personal appearances. And Gene Autry was our boss at the studio. He produced the annual play series, and he would take me out on tour with him. We went out for ten weeks doing rodeos and stuff.

So, I was still doing that kind of stuff, but during this time, my agent sent me over to Screen Gems, Columbia Pictures’ television division. They were doing a new show called The Donna Reed Show, and they needed a boyfriend. So, I went over there on that interview and talked with them, and I got the part, and it was the very first episode. They started shooting the shows and this episode was about Shelley Fabares who played Mary Stone, and she likes this star basketball player at school. And she hung out at the library, because this guy worked there at the library and she was trying to get him to take her out. And so, she was telling her mom, I wanted him to take me to the dance and he won’t give me any time of day. So, she said, well, he’s in the library, so why don’t you get some books and then have him carry them home for you. So, she does. And the problem is, I fall for the mother and not the daughter. So that was the whole episode. And the first day, we were sitting around the table getting ready to read the script. The writers are there, and then you read it and see what works and what doesn’t work. Well, before we started, I saw Donna Reed at the other end of the table. And I walked down and said, “Excuse me, my name is Jimmy Hawkins. I played your son, Tommy Bailey in It’s a wonderful Life.” 

She said, “I know. They said that they hired you for this part.” And she said, “You know, we used to call you rip van Winkle. You were so cute. You could sleep anytime. And all this commotion going on, with lighting and everything, and you just fell asleep. And then when everybody got ready, they’d wake you up, and you’d be bright-eyed, bushy-tailed, and ready to shoot. And it was just so cute that this little boy can sleep through all this. And that’s why we called you Rip Van Winkle.” And eight years later, I was still doing the show. 

JR: You had a friendship with her throughout her life as well, correct? 

JH: Oh yeah. Afterwards, you know, we’d go to lunch and stayed in touch by talking on the phone. Then, when Shelley Fabares got married, we were all together at her wedding.

Shelley and I stayed friends forever, I mean, she was my girlfriend on the Annie Oakley Television series. That’s when we first met in the middle fifties. But Donna Reed was just a great lady. I mean, no star time. She was very professional. Never said to anybody, anything negative, like, Hey, you’re supposed to shoot me this way. She was wonderful. Just the best. Like you see on the show. 

JR: And Jimmy Stewart?

JH: I’d run across Jimmy Stewart every so often at a party or something, and we would talk. Once, we talked about how they colorized It’s a Wonderful Life, when colorization first came in. He didn’t like it at all. No. He said it looked like a Walt Disney threw up on it. He was as nice as he appeared as well.

Paul Peterson and I wrote a book called the, It’s Wonderful Life Trivia Book. And so, I called Mr. Stewart and asked him if he would write the forward for me. And he did. And then, a couple of years later, I wrote the 50th Anniversary Scrapbook and sent a bunch of copies to him to autograph for charitable events. Shortly after, he passed away. But then they called me and said, come pick up the books. He signed them for you. 

JR: Oh, wow. 

JH: Yeah, he was very nice. 

JR: Have to ask. Were you terrified of Lionel Barrymore?

JH: Well, I didn’t have any scenes with him, but he was on the set, and I would ride around or stand on the side of his wheelchair and ride around the set. There’s a classic picture of all the major cast members from the movie that they took, and he’s in the wheelchair and I’m standing next to it. He was very nice man. 

I did Duel in the Sun with him later. And I also did Winchester ‘73 with Jimmy Stewart later. The very first line in Winchester ‘73, was spoken by me.

JR: Now I read how the film was not successful on its initial release and kind of fell out of the public eye for a while. When did it start making a resurgence?

JH: In the middle seventies, when somebody at the studio didn’t pick up the copyright and it went into public domain, which meant that TV stations could play it all over the nation for free. And they took advantage of that. And then it built, and built, and grew, and it just became more and more popular. TV made it a hit. I asked Sheldon Leonard about it, how it was a flop and now it’s such a big hit and isn’t that something? 

He said, “Well, you gotta remember one thing, Jimmy. The film never changed. The people changed. They needed that message more than ever. That was the same film he made in ‘46. And the reason that it bombed, the people weren’t ready for the message. But in the seventies, eighties, the nineties, it just kept growing and people just got the message of the movie that we’re all important. We all mean something. We can all make a difference. We can change lives for the better, if we choose. And that’s what that film tells us. You’re important. You, you, you, one person can make a difference.

JR: That’s absolutely true, and a great message. You know, before we did the interview, I went back and watched it again. And I’ve watched it often, and I knew what was coming and I knew what the ending was, and still, I bawled my eyes out.

JH: Yeah, everybody does. You can’t help it. You just can’t. It’s just, they’re so happy that all these people came to this man’s rescue when he was down. And he never thought he did anything in this life. But when he got to see what life would have been like if he had never been born and he sees, Oh my God, look at how Bedford falls turned into Pottersville. He was grateful to be back, send me to prison. Anything. I just want to come back right back.

JR: That message still resonates with people. How about yourself? Do you believe in guardian angels?

JH: Oh, sure. I believe that. I think there’s somebody out there that oversees us, and you know, of course, we have the choices to do good or bad. It’s up to us. You know, that’s why people say, well, if there’s a God, why would he do this? That’s what Jimmy Stewart said to Lionel Barrymore while he was making the film. He just said, you know, coming out of a war and seeing death and everything. This acting business seems like just nothing. It can’t compare to real life. And Barrymore told him, no, you’re very important. You speak to people for two hours in the dark and that’s very important. They listen to you, and you have a gift and you got to use God’s gift that he gave you. You can’t just go, well, I saw tragedy here. Well, you know, that’s what happens, but you’ve got to continue to do what you do. So, you can talk to people. They like you so very much. So, he stayed in there when he just wanted to go back home and help his dad in the family business in Indiana, Pennsylvania.

JR: He was right. Jimmy Stewart had a special quality to him. How often do you go back and watch the movie and what strikes you when you do?

JH: Well, you might be watching it Christmas Eve, especially wrapping gifts at the last moment. And you settle down and you say, “Oh, I like this scene.” Then that scene is over and then, “Oh, this one’s good, too.” And you’re sitting there at the end, crying. It just touches your life.

JR: So, you do go back and watch it frequently?

JH: Yeah, I watch it. Especially at Christmas time.

JR: You later became involved in the foundations for both Jimmy Stewart and Donna Reed. How did that come about?

JH:  Shelley Fabares, Paul Peterson, and Donna’s husband took her Oscar back to Denison Iowa. After Donna died, she wanted to give the town her Oscar. So, they took it back and presented it to them. The press was all there. And all of a sudden, this town is cooking. Just like 7,000 people live there. And now it’s busy and people are so interested in Shelley and Paul being there, and they asked them when they were ready to leave, why can’t you come back? Is there any reason, anything that we can help you with or you help us with? And so, Shelley came back, and she called me, and she said, we’re going to have a meeting at Donna’s house. Could you make it?

https://www.donnareed.org

Yeah, sure. I’ll do that. So, there are four or five of us there and discussing how we could go back to Denison, Iowa. We came up with this idea of a festival, and what we’d do is, have students come and learn, no matter what they’re learning at school or in high school and going into college. We’re going to prepare them how to really meet people in the business. How to be prepared. So, we had the acting people. And then we brought writers from comedy shows and dramatic shows and all these people wanted to take these different classes, and most of them are from high school. And then we have this festival, and we give out scholarships to kids to help them go to college, so they could study the arts and follow in Donna Reed’s footsteps. But they’d be more prepared to actually go to Hollywood. 

And we had a casting director who actually was the casting director on the Donna Reed show. He came back and taught the kids how to make them a resume and a headshot, then be prepared to walk into meeting real people. The writers from Brady Bunch, Gilligan’s Island and writers from Brian’s Song, and dramatic series like Gunsmoke. That’s what we did for 25 years. We gave out scholarships to kids to go to college and had all these classes. And it was like a campus, and you’d go from class to class. The kids would take up different things that they wanted to do. So that’s how that came about.

 

JR: Very generous. I also read that you go every year to Seneca falls, which claims to be the inspiration for Bedford falls. They have a whole It’s a Wonderful Life festival. Can you tell us a little bit about that? 

JH:  Zuzu started it. Almost twenty years ago. Somebody asked her to come there and sign autographs, and the same thing. She started doing it for many years. And then I think on the 15th or 16th year, she tried to get me and Janie to go. I couldn’t get away, but then, on the 70th anniversary of the movie, which is now four years ago, I could make it. I’ve been there for three years and then this year helped them do kind of did a virtual festival. It’s on their website right now. And you can see live things or programs going on, different interviews and stuff associated with It’s a Wonderful Life. And there’s a whole program each day, where you can go from class to class. 

We’re always doing interviews, but we never take any credit for the movie because we were only on it for twelve days, but we’re the last people standing. People love the Bailey family. They want to talk to us about the movie, much like yourself. And we just carry Frank Capra’s message, since he’s not alive to do it anymore.

https://www.wonderfullifemuseum.com/

JR: I think it’s great that you do. 

JH: Well, we believe in the movie and, and the message. We’re all important. You know, people come up to us and said they wanted to commit suicide and they didn’t after seeing the movie and it really touched lives for the better. I think this movie, if it was a hit in 1946, it would never be what it is now. But something meant to be, that it was a flop then, but grew to be one of the greatest movies ever made. Not just that people say, Oh, it’s the greatest holiday movie. True. But it’s also one of the greatest movies. I mean, it’s just up there, and it would never have been like that unless those people made it that way. Capra, before he died, saw all this. He came out of World War II, hadn’t looked through a camera in five years, and now he’s on a set, doing this movie, and he was scared to death. He didn’t know if he still had it. And then the movie comes out and it’s a flop. Oh my God, he was devastated. Just didn’t understand it. He said, this is the greatest movie I’ve ever made. And look, it’s nothing. It’s just nothing. They were up for five Oscars, but not a hit in the box office. Lost half a million dollars and he was devastated. But he lived a long enough to see that he was right. 

JR: Some vindication for him. 

JH: Yes, absolutely. I asked him if he could change anything if he had to do it over again? He said, the one thing I would change would be the Donna Reed character, at the end, when she was a meek librarian. He said, I wouldn’t have done that. I would have made it a much stronger person. A now kind of person after World War II. Forceful. A woman who was that dedicated to fall in love and chase Jimmy Stewart until she caught him, would never be some weak little woman. She would have done something strong-willed. He said that that’s the only thing he would change. I talked to Donna about it, and she said, he told her that too. 

JR: Now, I read that there was supposed to be a planned sequel called, It’s a Wonderful Life: The Rest of the Story, whatever happened with that?

JH: Yeah, people have come up with stuff, but, you know, they say they have the money, but they don’t. They just talk and they get their publicity, and then they move on. You can’t remake that movie. The thing I’ve done that’s closest to it. I did an all-star PBS film special. A big charity event that I was putting on for kids with AIDS. Babies who had AIDS, and all the money went to them and their cause. And I sold it to PBS, and they filmed it. And PBS made a lot of money from it, for the cause, but it was the radio version. And not only did it entertain, but it educated the people that this is what we were raised with in the twenties and thirties, it was radio. It wasn’t until the late forties that TV came in. But before that it was radio. And so, I had a guy from the original radio show days, do all the sound effects. He was on the stage, right up front, to let the people see how they did all that. And I had a 14-piece orchestra playing the original Dmitri Tiomkin score. 

JR: Oh wow. 

JH: And people would sit in their chairs, until it was time to walk four or five steps to their microphone. And they did their part, and when they finished that part, they would go sit down again. Sally field did it. And Nathan Lane was Clarence. Bill Pullman played George Bailey. This was for the 50th anniversary. Christian Slater was in it. Jerry Van Dyke. Casey Kasemdid the announcing. Carol Kane, Robert Guillaume. It was a great thing. 

JR: Next year is the 75th. Any big plans for that?

JH: Yeah, there’s a lot of talk and things are in motion to try and make these things happen, but it will be something special. No doubt because it’s 75. 

JR:  I’m definitely looking forward to it. I’ll move on to a couple of other things from your career. I recently interviewed Margaret Kerry who starred with you in The Ruggles, one of the first television sitcoms. What can you tell us about that experience?

JH: Well, it was very unique. Back in the forties, nobody knew what television was. They didn’t know how to do it. They went like, well, this is the way we do it on radio. So, we just bring that to television. The series was live. We rehearsed all week and then shot it live. 

JR: Incredible. 

JH: We did that at night, and did fifty shows a year. And then we had a two-week vacation. 

Nowadays, they say, Oh, we’re doing a special night. It’s live! Yeah, that’s no big deal. We were told, don’t ever stop. If you don’t remember your lines, say something because it’ll come back to you, but you can’t just stop and go, Hey, what? I don’t know my line. You can’t do that. 

And we’d even do the commercials for our own show. The other twin, Judy Nugent, and me. And we we’d go up, and we’d start laughing. We couldn’t remember dog foods or chicken liver cheese or something, whatever chicken liver and what, and we’d just look at each other and start laughing. It was really something. I’m sure Margaret shared some stories with you.

JR: Yes she did. She was a great interview. Fantastic. Fascinating woman. Looking at your resume, you were on some of the most iconic TV shows. Ozzie and Harriet, Petticoat Junction. You made appearances on Leave it to Beaver and Kolchak, My Three Sons. Any anecdotes from those shows that you can share?

JH: Yeah. There was uniqueness between all the shows I did. They were shot the same. They were one camera. You’d rehearse a day and then you shoot three days and then that would be it. But there were two shows that were different. They didn’t do it that way. Gidget did it, Petticoat Junction did it, Leave it to Beaver. Just all of the shows. Did the read around, come in and shoot your day or your two days or three days. You know, if you weren’t a big part of the show, they’d just bring you in on the day you need to shoot you, they didn’t need to rehearse you. Most of the Donna Reeds that I did, were kind of written for me, so they’d wait if I was doing an Ozzie and Harriet we’d do that Donna Reed show later. You know, the next week or something. 

The two shows that were different were, My Three Sons, and Ozzie and Harriet. With Ozzie and Harriet, instead of just five days, they’d shoot six or seven days because it was his show. That’s the way he did it. He made a deal with ABC to deliver this for X amount of dollars. And he would do that. In fact, he would go home and watch the show when it was on Thursday night. And if he saw something he didn’t like, he’d go back to the studio the next morning while we were doing the show. And, because they had all the characters, the same Ozzy, Harriet, David, Ricky. So, if he didn’t like it, he’d reshoot it and then put it in for the rerun.

JR: (Laughs) That’s so funny. 

JH: Yeah. And then the other show that was unique was, My Three Sons. They hired you and would say, okay, February 18th, you shoot, and May 30th. You’d have to make yourself available for four months, five months later, finish the show, because Fred MacMurray had a unique deal, and he had to shoot all his stuff in three months. All 39 shows or whatever. And so, any scene that you were in with him, you’d have to be available in that three months period. The other part of that show that was different was, you were in scenes that he wasn’t. So that was unique. It was very interesting. I did over four hundred TV shows and about forty some odd movies. 

JR: My Three Sons was one of my favorites.  Have to ask this. I’m a huge Elvis fan, and you did two movies with him!

I went to MGM in ‘64 since they wanted to meet me for an Elvis movie. We’re sitting in one of these little casting rooms, shooting the breeze. They always say the same thing. Well, Jimmy, how’s everything going? What are you doing lately? I’ve been doing blah, blah, blah. And then all of a sudden, Joe Pasternak, the producer, says, were you on Petticoat Junction the other night? I said, yeah. And he turned to everybody in the room and said, he’s great. He can do anything. There are three characters in this movie with Elvis and I want you to meet with the director. He’ll explain the three characters and, you’ll pick one out. He turned to the room. He’ll pick out who he thinks he best can play, and then, that’s the part he’ll do. So, I got a copy of the script and I think the best part is Doc. So, then they wanted to test a girl. I was the first person to be signed to do the movie. And they were testing the girl to play opposite Elvis. So, they asked me, would you do this test? You play the Elvis part in this test with this girl. Yeah, sure. I knew the girl, and she was from New York. And so, the night before, she asked me to come over and run through the script together. We did, and then when I was on the set the next, she did a fine job, but she wasn’t the part at all, just all wrong.

They did the scene with the both of us. Then they went in for her closeup, so I walked off. I walked maybe two steps, and all of sudden in front of me, the director stops me. I look at him, and he says, tell me about Shelley Fabares.

Now, I knew exactly what he was saying. Shelley’s a friend since were twelve. The girl on the set is a friend of mine. I said, well, if this doesn’t work out, which I knew it wouldn’t. Not that she wasn’t good. She just was wrong. I said, if this doesn’t work out, Shelley is this part. He said, thank you, and that was it. And Shelly was signed. I’m sure they were considering her before. He knew I worked with her for four or five years. I mean, she’s so wonderful in the part. And then we did another picture together with Elvis. We did two of them and then she went on to do a third one. I said, how could you do one without me?

JR: What was Elvis like to work with?

JH: He was great. One day, we were sitting in my dressing room. They were lighting the scene for when we were actually doing the film. And we were sitting there talking, and all of a sudden there’s a knock on the door. We had the dressing rooms on rollers and they’re a nice size. You can sit there, and you got a chaise lounge. You could lay down or they can make you up in the room and all this stuff. And so, we look over at the door, it was open, and there’s standing Elvis. No entourage, just Elvis. He asked, “Can I come in?” What? Wow. So, he comes in, and I had a call that morning from the producer of a new pilot they were doing, and he wanted to come down on the stage and actually meet me, so be on the look-out for him. 

So, I’m sitting there with Elvis and his leading lady in my dressing room, and another knock at the door and the guy says, Mr. Hawkins. I said, yeah. And then he looks up and now standing in the doorway is this producer of this new series, the head of MGM studios, and the head of television, standing there. And they go, Oh my God, we’ll come back later. I said, no, no, no, it’s all right. And so, I excuse myself with Elvis and Shelley, and walk over. And we started talking, they explain the show, and asked, is that something that you’d be interested in doing?

I said, “Yeah, sure.”

And they left, and I thought, Oh my God, could, the timing have been any better? I wasn’t sitting in Elvis’s dressing room. He was sitting in mine! I just was blown away, not cocky or anything. Just how ironic that they would come at that time. Then look up and see who was sitting in my dressing room. And, Oh my God, they said, Oh, I’m sorry. We’ll come back. Uh, wonderful. And Shelley and I laugh about that till today. We just loved Elvis. Loved working on the show. Just had so much fun. Girl Happy was great. 

JR: What a great story! And you were also with him on Spinout.

JH:  I didn’t like that picture.

JR: You didn’t like Spinout?

JH: No, I didn’t. It wasn’t as much fun to work on. Elvis was always great, but Girl Happy was great. I mean, it was a good movie. Well-structured for fun. Well-directed, everything. The other was, I don’t know . . ..

I mean, how bad can it be? You’re working with Elvis and Shelley again and met Diana Bain and, so that part was great.

JR: True. It had been some years since I’ve seen Spinout. Girl Happy. I’ve watched more recently. I had wanted to watch it one more time before I spoke with you. Okay, the home stretch here, the last few questions. Since we’re a site devoted to children’s books. What was your favorite childhood book?

JH: Growing up? It was a thing called Sawdust in his Shoes. It was a book that I read while I was doing the Annie Oakley series.  I was twelve, maybe thirteen. I love this book. It was all about a kid who was in the circus and then his parents died, and he leaves the circus cause he’s so despondent. And he’s found by a farmer and his family. It was great story. Really, really good. Later on, I tried to buy it to make a movie out of it. And it was hard to find the writer and who owned the rights. It just got too convoluted, you know, but I always remembered, I thought it’d make a good episode of Little House on the Prairie.

JR: I’m going to look that up. Now, with so many people loving It’s a Wonderful Life, what’s your favorite movie? 

JH: I love It’s a Wonderful Life, but that same year, a picture was produced called, Best Years of Our Lives. I love that. That won the Best Picture over It’s a Wonderful Life, but isn’t that funny?

It’s what I said earlier, if It’s a Wonderful Life had won the Oscar that year, which it certainly could have deserved, no doubt. You wouldn’t ever have heard of it. I mean, what do you hear about Best Years of Our Lives? It’s been on television, but it’s not an event or anything like It’s a Wonderful Life. So, all that stuff happens for a reason. 

I believe you talked about it being spiritual, and yes, I believe that there are guardian angels looking after us. And, things happen for a reason. You know, I go, why didn’t that happen? Or why didn’t this work out for me, or whatever. And it was for a reason. And years later you go, that was a good move. I’m glad that didn’t happen for me or whatever. You know. I was up for a picture with Elvis called Kissin’ Cousins. I knew the producer, Sam Katzman from over at Columbia and now he’s over at MGM doing this movie. So, he said, Hey, I want you to meet the director of this picture. So, I got there and I’m meeting with the director, Gene Nelson. And he said, “Jimmy, were you having lunch today with Pam Austin?” I said, yeah.

He said, “You know, I thought you were Elvis having lunch.” 

I said, “Oh yeah. A lot of people mixed me up with him.” (Laughs) So, he said, “Well, Elvis plays twins in this, and you can’t have three Elvises.”

 And so I’m saying to myself, Oh, he wants somebody else in this part. He wants some friend of his. And I understand. So, I was disappointed that I couldn’t do Kissin’ Cousins, but then came Girl Happy and that was great. 

JR: Girl Happy is a much better film. 

JH: Oh yeah.

JR: How can people follow you on social media?

JH: I don’t know. I’m on Facebook, but I don’t really tell anybody. Some people find me and leave messages on there, and they’re very nice and it’s kinda neat, but no, I don’t advertise that I’m even there, but somehow, they find you. 

JR: They always find you. You’ve done several books based on It’s a Wonderful Life. Tell us about them.

JH: The kids’ book, It’s a Wonderful Life, did extremely well. Over the years, people always told me, I used to watch it with my parents, and now I have children and they watch with me. And I look at the kid, and they say they enjoy it, but it’s kind of hard about understanding about building and loans and stuff, isn’t it? So, I thought, I’m going to write a book that’s geared for them. I’ll do a book from their point of view, so that a kid their age goes through this and loses the money at school. And then he, he just wants to run away. And then he runs into this angel on the bridge. And not that he was going to commit suicide or anything, but it’s a way out of town, over the bridge and you’re out of town. So, I wrote it from the point of view of the character that I was in the movie, and I take him from four to about eleven, and he gets to see what life would have been like if he hadn’t been born. 

And so that’s the kind of approach I took. They see how important they are. That they mean something. So, don’t screw your life up and commit suicide because you’re depressed about something. It can get better. So that’s the approach I took, and they did extremely well. And, I’ve even been talked to about making an animated movie, but they could never come to an agreement. 

JR: Oh, that’s too bad. 

JH: Yeah, so I’ll wait. It’s only going to get more popular, so if it’s supposed to happen. It’ll happen.

JR: Mr. Hawkins, I thank you so much for doing this. It was an honor getting to speak with you. I enjoyed talking immensely.

JH: It was my pleasure.

 

Well, Mixed-Up Filers, I hope you enjoyed getting to visit Bedford Falls and spending time with the Baileys. On behalf of Mixed-Up Files, I wish you all a very Happy Holiday season.

Until next time . . .

Jonathan

ANIMALS’ ADVENTURES WITH THEIR YOUNG HUMAN FRIENDS (for Middle Grade Readers)

What can be better than to spend one’s youth with an animal companion, or to have a special, even if momentary, connection with an animal? Here are some books that show this is really a good and interesting way to grow up, in a variety of happenings.  Here are some examples.

   In this series of four books, with a fifth that fits the storyline, Monica Dickens (a granddaughter of Charles) has written stories featuring a ranch owned by a retired British colonel who has set up this ranch to help retired and injured horses. Helping him run the ranch are a young teen relative, Callie; and two other teens (Dora and Steve). 

Young British teen Velvet Brown dreams of owning a horse and being the best rider around the countryside. One day in town she sees a horse being auctioned off. The owner obviously just wants to be rid of this particular horse, a piebald. Velvet amazingly manages to win the horse.  With the help of her family, and someone who works for her father, Velvet indeed learns to ride the horse well. Then her big dream begins; or seems possible. She wants to be part of a horse race. However, no girls are permitted in this race. What can Velvet do now?!

In their small town in Sonoma County, California,  11-year-old Weston and his 9-year-old sister, Wendy, search for something interesting to do during a summer. Suddenly they find some abandoned  animals and work to help them. Soon they want to help lots of animals they find, but will some people try to stop them? What can they do about that?!

12 year old Davy and his cousin Anderson (often irksome), are intrigued by lights they detect in a forest. They venture into the woods to find out what’s there. The boys make a discovery, are caught near a forest fire, and then desperately attempt to accomplish what they are determined to do!  

Young siblings Maureen and Paul have been saving their money to buy a particular horse they have seen at an annual local round-up of one of two groups of wild horses on Assateague Island (shared by the states of Maryland and Virginia). After being rounded up the caught horses are sent on a run and swim to nearby Chincoteague Island where some will be sold. This annual even happens so the wild horse herds won’t overcrowd the island. The horse the siblings are interested in, with its tell-tale white patch, has avoided capture for some years. By chance, this time, however, this horse is among the horses that are captured. The young people are all set to bargain to buy this horse, but then they find out she has her little colt with her. Will the young people be able to get enough money to buy the mother horse, and the baby too?! 

After visiting his uncle in India, young Alec is on his way home to New York by way of England, in a cargo ship. An unusual fellow passenger is a wild horse. The boy secretly makes friends with the animal by leaving a lump of sugar at the horse’s makeshift stall every night. After several days of travel, the boat is caught in a storm and is destroyed, but not before the boy manages to try to free the horse before abandoning ship. Suddenly Alex is drawn into the water while tied to the animal. For days the boy and horse, tied together, swim near each other. Then, the horse suddenly changes course, and Alex, bewildered, must follow. But then he sees that the horse has found an island. Can they both make it to the island; exhausted as they are; and then can they strive to learn to live and coexist together on the island; not knowing if there are other survivors, or if they will be ever be rescued!

A  young teen is happy living near her granddad’s farm where she can ride her very own horse whenever she wants to. Then suddenly she’s very upset when she hears of her family moving miles away. What can she do? Can she convince her granddad to let her live with him? She must strive to get his attention which is all but taken up by a neighbor woman.

A young woman who’s an artist, and handicapped, discovers a horse who is lame. The young woman so wants to help the horse. Will she and her family be able to?

A horse’s life story, told from the viewpoint of the horse.

A classic story that led to many sequels by various authors. Joe, a boy, and his dog are happy living their lives, but then the boy’s father has money difficulties and must sell the pure-bred dog. After being sold, the dog escapes and comes back home to Joe. The dog is sold again, but again finds his way back to Joe. Sold a third time, Lassie faces a giant challenge when she strives to get back home this time. Her new owner is in another nation! Can she do it?! 

  In addition to picture books and comic books, there is a series of chapter books, also considered novels for young readers, published by Whitman many years ago. These books feature a German Shepherd dog called Rin Tin Tin, and a boy named Rusty. Rusty became an orphan when his group’s wagon train was attacked. A nearby fort with an early American cavalry troop patrolling the frontier took in the boy to live with them. Rin Tin Tin, a stray German shepherd dog, lives at the fort too. The boy and dog become inseparable companions. Both the boy and the dog in these novel chapters have many adventures in the early western United States territory.  

 In this sequel to MY SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN, and ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN, this story features an endangered bird who was saved by Sam, a teen, who lives with his younger sister on their grandfather’s land in the Catskill Mountains in New York State.  The bird became Sam’s pet, but then a forest ranger took the bird away, saying it was illegal for the boy to have such a pet. Through the books MY SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN and ON THE FAR SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN, the bird, a falcon named Frightful, is part of the story, then there’s FRIGHTFUL’S STORY in which she strives to get back to Sam. 

A girl, temporarily handicapped, visiting her grandmother, is entertained with stories by a local storekeeper. One particular story intrigues her – a legend about a white lark that few people believe exists. Then one day the girl suddenly discovers something the white lark reveals to her. 

Two dogs and a cat, separated from their family, are determined to travel across country, to get back to their owners. Told from the viewpoints of the animals.

A young girl just recently comes to live with her grandmother in a remote country place, and comes to love and care about the nature that’s all around her. One day a young man happens to come into the area. He asks her where a white heron, said to be around there may be found. The girl notices that the man carryies a gun. Should she tell him where the elusive bird can be seen? The decision she makes will be a turning point in her life. The way her life turns out, at the time the story was written, in 1886, will be a hardship. Readers might consider – if a girl of today in this situation had to make such a decision, what would it be, and how would her life turn out because of it? Such an ending is telling for our present time.  

 

STEM Tuesday — Coding– Interview with Janet Slingerland

Welcome to STEM Tuesday: Author Interview & Book Giveaway, a repeating feature for the last Tuesday of every month. Go Science-Tech-Engineering-Math!

 

Many of us on the STEM Tuesday team work hard to showcase the often unsung heroes writing books that spark the imagination of young readers. But it is not often that we get to celebrate one of our own. Today we are interviewing Janet Slingerland – author Coding Creations, Coding 123 and Video Game Coding. Janet is a STEM advocate whose books have covered a wide range of non-fiction topics for k-12. The subjects include plant development, atoms and molecules, nanotechnology, military vehicles and more.

* * *

Christine Taylor-Butler: Janet, You are a kindred spirit. We both grew up reading, writing and conducting science experiments as kids. What was the most ambitious experiment you tried as a child? Was there praise and encouragement or were your parents (like mine) a bit flabbergasted?

JJanet and butterflyanet Slingerland: When I was growing up, I did a little bit of everything. I wrote really bad poetry, played lots of instruments (everything but strings and percussion) and sang, wandered around the woods, did theater, played sports, and read A LOT. When I was really young, I remember making mud pies and performing “experiments” at the dinner table. I’m sure you can guess what my parents thought of those experiments. I’m not sure I ever got really ambitious with science experiments after that. I fell in love with math and physics in high school – that propelled me into engineering school.

CTB: Women in children’s literature aren’t often acknowledged for our technical backgrounds. You earned a degree in electrical engineering and wrote computer software before becoming a writer. Tell us a bit about that journey. What it was like writing subroutines for submarines (and other machines)!

Janet: I’mCoding 1 2 3 not sure I really knew what I was getting into when I went to engineering school. I loved physics and math, but the science and math I had to learn in college was at a level I had never imagined! It was in college that I wrote my first computer program. Programming (or coding) combines learning another language with logical thinking – two things I’m pretty good at. (I was almost fluent in Spanish when I graduated from high school – unfortunately, I’ve forgotten most of it since then.)

When I graduated from college, I entered the Edison Engineering Program at General Electric Aerospace.  The location I worked at was originally an RCA/Victor facility – where they once made Victrola phonographs. It still specialized in communication systems, so I ended up working in both coding and codes. I programmed computers inside things like submarines, telephones, and airplanes. The programs I worked on supported secure communications – things that used cryptography to make the communications unintelligible to anyone spying on them.

I found the work incredibly rewarding. I still remember the first day we got our secure telephone system working in the lab. We were talking back and forth, and it sounded like we were just talking over a regular telephone. We spent several days convincing ourselves that our voices were being encrypted and decrypted – old encrypted systems would warp the voices so it was obvious you were not talking on a normal phone.

CTB: When I was learning coding, it was Fortran, then PL1. Computers were room sized. That was a long time ago. How much has coding changed since you were in the field? Ever think of diving back in?

Janet: My first programming language was also Fortran – Fortran 77, to be exact. My college year was one of the first that wasn’t required to program a computer using punch cards. (It was fun to see those in the movie Hidden Figures.)

Fortran example

Example of Fortran 77


When I was working, I programmed primarily in assembly language and C. Assembly language doesn’t read like a normal language. It’s designed at a very low level. Grace Hopper was one of the visionaries who felt that a computer language should read in a way that you could tell what the programmer was intending for the computer to do.

I know coding has changed a bit since I first learned it. There are a lot more languages out there, running on a lot more platforms (like cell phones and e-readers/tablets). But I think at its core, coding hasn’t changed much at all. Logic really doesn’t change over time, and a coding language is really just a tool coders use to communicate with a computer. It’s easy to learn a new tool once you know the basics.

I do sometimes feel the desire to get back to coding. There is something very satisfying in starting with just an idea and building up code that brings that idea to life.

CTB: Your books cover a wide range of topics. Why did you make the switch from engineering to writing books about STEM?

Janet: I’ve always loved books and reading. It turns out, I also always had a love of writing. I was often the person (or one of the people) who wrote the documentation for our work – whether that was a lab in school or a project at work.

I found being a woman in the field of engineering/coding to be very challenging. When I was pregnant with my 3rd child, I struggled a lot with the work environment. When he was born, I found the joys at work were too few compare to the struggles. I started following my second love – writing. My background in math, science, and engineering, and my endless curiosity made writing STEM a natural fit.

CTB: So one advantage of writing in STEM is that you are never bored. It’s a major component in the development of just about everything.

Janet: So true! I have yet to find a subject that wasn’t totally fascinating once I started learning about it

Coding Creations CoverCTB: For purely selfish reasons I was fascinated by your book, Coding Creations, which covers Scratch, a free coding language for young people developed by my alma mater. I had not realized MIT’s Media Lab had a Lifelong Kindergarten Group division. Did you have an opportunity to experiment with Scratch while writing the book?

Janet: Absolutely! The first thing I had to do for Coding Creations was to decide on what computer language we would use. I tried out a few, including Scratch and Python – two free coding languages. (I didn’t want money to be a barrier that would keep a curious kid from learning about coding.)

A lot of people dismiss Scratch because it is a block coding language. Each command is represented by a block you connect together to build a program. Scratch doesn’t let you put the blocks together in a way that won’t work. In traditional coding languages, you have to use the proper syntax – you need to spell commands correctly, give them the correct inputs, and use the proper punctuation – in order for it to work. Sometimes, a simple error in syntax can take a long time to figure out.

Scratch example

Scratch 3.0

When I was working with Scratch for the book, I realized it’s actually a very powerful language. It has some limitations, but there are ways to work around most of them. It also works on many different platforms. You don’t even need to download it onto your computer – you can work with it online, if you have a reliable internet connection. That means you can work on your code from different computers if you have to.

My kids used Scratch when they were in school. One of the things that frustrated them is that they were given a lot of time to “play around.” Unfortunately, they didn’t really know much about coding and didn’t feel comfortable playing around with it. My goal with Coding Creations was to introduce readers to Scratch so they would be comfortable playing around with it. Not only did I want to give them a taste of what they could do with it – animation, music/sound, drawing, and coding – but I wanted them to see what other resources were available from Scratch so they could explore more on their own.

Video Game CoverCTB: For students interested in video games as a career, your book on Video Game Coding might serve as a launching point for exploring careers. At my daughter’s college, for instance, students in the video games division had a 100% rate of employment at graduation. If you had to do it again, would you code video games? Or better, what’s your favorite if you play them?

Janet: I wrote the Video Game Coding book mainly because I have a son who is interested in coding – specifically in video game coding. I wanted to learn how video game coding was similar to and different from the coding I did. As I suspected, the basics are pretty much the same, but there are differences in the details – and, of course, in how fun the end result is.

I think a lot of young gamers imagine video game coding to be a very glamorous career. While I’m sure it has its moments of fun and glamour – it’s like all other programming careers. It’s a lot of work and long hours.

All of my kids are big gamers. My favorite video games are puzzle and word games. I’ve tried playing games with my kids, and it’s pitiful – I have no idea what I’m doing. If it’s a game where you lose lives, I die VERY quickly. I could probably get into something like Animal Crossing (one of my daughter’s favorite games), but I honestly prefer to read.

Secret Life of Plants coverCTB: One of the things I love about your website is that you include resources to pair with each book. For instance, for your graphic novel on The Secret Life of Plants, you list not only links to science experiments, but a plant detective game, and the world carrot museum. Whats one of the most unusual or fascinating resources you encountered?

Janet:  That’s a really tough question. In addition to writing, I do a lot of work with scouts. When my daughter was younger, I was a Girl Scout leader. Now, I’m a Scouts BSA merit badge counselor. For that and for STEM Tuesday, I’m always looking for new ways to engage with or learn about things.

MoleculariumThere are a few things that pop into my head as being unusually compelling – and the World Carrot Museum is definitely up there. Another is the Molecularium Project – which was put out by one of my alma maters, Rensselaer – https://www.molecularium.com. It’s like a video game where you can explore molecules.

Phet LogoI also love PhET – https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulations. This site is filled with simulations that illustrate just about every math and science concept you can think of. For instance, here’s one that shows how people see color: https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/color-vision . It shows that seeing color actually involves more that one science – it involves the physics of light and the biology of the human eye.

CTB: People often conflate STEM with pushing young people into careers in coding. Your book Sports Science and Technology was an excellent example of how STEM is used everywhere, including careers that might dovetail with a person’s real interest. For instance, part of helping a gymnast improve their skill is understanding physics. What one thing fascinated you as you researched sports related applications for STEM?

Sports Technology CoverJanet: I think we need to stop thinking putting things in bins. People think they’re either artsy or mathematical. They’re either sporty or sciencey. There are crossovers in everything.

My father was a gym teacher. Growing up, I played field hockey, volleyball, and track and field. I also marched in marching band. It amazed me that people didn’t view it as a sport – it was just as physically demanding as the other sports I participated in.

I think what fascinated me the most while researching my Sports Science books was how old the idea of sports science is. These ideas started long, long ago, when gladiators were fighting in the Roman coliseum. What’s kind of amazing is how long it took for those ideas to catch on in modern-day sports.

CTB. What’s next on the horizon for Janet Slingerland? Any upcoming books or projects we should be watching out for

QuietvsLoud coverJanet: A few years ago, I wrote a 12-book series about the weird creatures in the world. The books were delayed, and then 2020 happened. I hope I get to see them in print before too much time goes by. I have another book coming out in 2021 from The Child’s World called Quiet vs. Loud. This book helps young readers learn about the physics of sound.

There are a few other books I’m working on. Hopefully, I’m able to get some publishers as excited about them as I am. I call one of them a SHTEAM book – it adds history to science, technology, engineering, art, and math – all related to an object so common people barely notice it anymore.

CTB: Thanks, Janet, for taking time out to talk to us!

Win a FREE copy of “Coding Creations” or “Video Game Coding”.

Enter the giveaway by leaving a comment below. The randomly-chosen winner will be contacted via email and asked to provide a mailing address (within the U.S. only) to receive the book.

Good luck!

Janet Slingerland studied engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Drexel University. She has written many science books for children, including The Secret Lives of Plants!, which was named a Top 40 YA nonfiction book by the Pennsylvania School Librarians Association. Janet lives in Mount Laurel, New Jersey with her husband, three kids and a dog named “Rocky.”

To learn more about Janet and her books, please visit www.janetsbooks.com. You can follow her on Twitter @SlingSong. Or on Facebook at www.facebook.com/janetsbooks
***
Christine Taylor-ButlerYour host is Christine Taylor-Butler, MIT engineering nerd and author of Bathroom Science, Sacred Mountain: Everest, Genetics, and more than 70 other nonfiction books for kids. She is also the author of the middle grade sci-fi series The Lost Tribes. Follow @ChristineTB on Twitter and/or @ChristineTaylorButler on Instagram